| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 01:19 |
|
pdurbin |
dotplus: you're our fearless leader, right? But prologic wrote all the code at https://github.com/openknot and now he's gone as of http://irclog.greptilian.com/openknot/2016-04-14 . What do you make of this? Keep on keeping on? Shut it all down (including my logging of this channel)? |
| 03:19 |
|
bear |
I'm still working on it, sure, not at a fast pace - but I would like to keep the github repo up. We are all on other irc channels so don't feel the urgency there |
| 10:29 |
|
pdurbin |
bear: cool, cool. I don't at all mind logging this channel. Come to think of it, kdb may be logging it as well. :) |
| 10:30 |
|
pdurbin |
And we've picked up a couple new people in this channel (raucao and botka) which is nice. |
| 10:32 |
|
pdurbin |
bear: I'd be interested to hear what you've been working on related to openknot, even if you don't have much to report. |
| 12:27 |
|
dotplus |
I am? uh, ok. I thought I just wrote some descriptive/vision material. No, I don't want to close either this channel or the github org. |
| 12:28 |
|
dotplus |
I would like to try to have a conversation about our current interest/opinions and what prologic's departure means for us. |
| 12:28 |
|
pdurbin |
dotplus: I'm pretty sure you created this channel and the github org :) |
| 12:29 |
|
dotplus |
that's true |
| 12:30 |
|
pdurbin |
dotplus: don't get me wrong. I'm glad you did. I'm into the idea of openknot. I just don't know what the plan is. :) |
| 12:31 |
|
dotplus |
we still have the same ideals. but we're a little stale on the planning and implementation. |
| 12:31 |
|
pdurbin |
sivoais: I think you're the only person I haven't @mentioned yet. Any thoughts? |
| 12:32 |
|
pdurbin |
dotplus: so we do plan to implement something? |
| 12:32 |
|
pdurbin |
or is our output a great idea for someone else to implement? |
| 12:33 |
|
pdurbin |
what is our deliverable? |
| 12:33 |
|
pdurbin |
or are we just here to chat, which is ok with me? :) |
| 12:33 |
|
pdurbin |
I feel like these days people want a reference implementation, not just a big idea. |
| 12:34 |
|
dotplus |
I absolutely think that the OK goal includes code. |
| 12:36 |
|
pdurbin |
"OK goal"? |
| 12:36 |
|
dotplus |
OpenKnot |
| 12:37 |
|
pdurbin |
oh, oh. duh |
| 12:38 |
|
pdurbin |
So are we looking for people to join who have time to write code? |
| 12:39 |
|
pdurbin |
we've been having daily "explain any blockers" meetings at work lately :) |
| 12:39 |
|
dotplus |
absolutely, but I think we need to make some decisions/updates about the direction as well (probably before expecting to be able to excite anyone to join in) |
| 12:42 |
|
pdurbin |
I've had a couple IRC channels I started that fizzled and died: http://irclog.greptilian.com/spanworm/2013-02-08 http://irclog.greptilian.com/wonderstudy/2013-05-12 |
| 12:45 |
|
pdurbin |
I guess I'm thinking that if there's a similar enough effort somewhere else we could fold ourselves into it. |
| 12:51 |
|
pdurbin |
But again, I'm also fine with continuing to just hang out. :) |
| 14:20 |
|
sivoais |
I haven't had enough time to think about OK to be honest. I've been setting up milestones and reading papers for Project Renard (doc reader) lately. |
| 14:21 |
|
sivoais |
Don't know if I can contribute code to OK just yet! |
| 15:38 |
|
pdurbin |
oh, right. https://github.com/project-renard/curie/issues/66 |
| 16:52 |
|
pdurbin |
bear: any more thoughts? |
| 17:38 |
|
bear |
sounds like we need to continue to generate some goals and targets; then generate even the most throwaway of reference implementations... the coders will follow :) |
| 18:07 |
|
pdurbin |
sounds good |
