| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 05:51 |
|
|
mmatloka joined #virtualJUG |
| 08:45 |
|
|
edburns joined #virtualJUG |
| 10:31 |
|
|
RedEnergy joined #virtualJUG |
| 10:56 |
|
|
millrossjez joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:37 |
|
|
blvin joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:39 |
|
|
Jens81 joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:42 |
|
|
Ehsanullah joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:44 |
|
|
radcortez joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:44 |
|
|
radcortez left #virtualJUG |
| 14:45 |
|
|
radcortez joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:45 |
|
radcortez |
hi guys |
| 14:45 |
|
radcortez |
we are starting very soon the next session |
| 14:47 |
|
|
ejan joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:49 |
|
|
embarros joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:50 |
|
|
ehja joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:52 |
|
|
Lazurowy joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:52 |
|
|
Lazurowy joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:53 |
|
radcortez |
we are live! |
| 14:54 |
|
|
ehja joined #virtualJUG |
| 14:55 |
|
radcortez |
you can send your questions live! |
| 14:56 |
|
ejan |
What's the best way of implementing equals() and hashCode() for a JPA entity that uses auto-generated primary key since, by definition, the value of its primary key will not be known until after the entity is persisted? |
| 14:58 |
|
radcortez |
hi ejan, ty for your question, I'll relay it in a bit |
| 15:01 |
|
|
sebi joined #virtualJUG |
| 15:03 |
|
|
sblanc joined #virtualJUG |
| 15:05 |
|
|
blvin joined #virtualJUG |
| 15:08 |
|
|
embarros joined #virtualJUG |
| 15:10 |
|
radcortez |
send us more questions :) |
| 15:13 |
|
ejan |
May be still somewhat unrelated to the current discussion but definitely a question that every Java EE developer struggles with -- here goes: |
| 15:13 |
|
ejan |
What's the recommended / best practice for using configuration in Java EE applications (considering there's no spec addressing Java EE configuration today)? Consider, for example, how we can flexibly load configuration from various .properties files in Spring without writing any code. How can we achieve the same level of flexibility in Java EE apps today when it comes to configuration? Also, when do you think we'll finally have a |
| 15:13 |
|
ejan |
spec address standardization of configuration in Java EE apps? |
| 15:14 |
|
radcortez |
there was a spec about configuration |
| 15:14 |
|
radcortez |
I think it got canceled / delay |
| 15:14 |
|
radcortez |
I'll ask :) |
| 15:15 |
|
ejan |
You're right -- unfortunately that spec didn't get a lot of traction |
| 15:16 |
|
sblanc |
ejan: a "dirty/hacky" way is to use maven's Resource plugin and the filtering , and use profiles |
| 15:16 |
|
ejan |
The danger of relying on a business key in any persistence scenario is that you cannot guarantee that the key will not change for the life of the record -- and that comes with a lot of side effects if you ever have to change the business key |
| 15:16 |
|
ejan |
I like Antonio's idea of having a UUID acting as a row ID -- that's still a synthetic key and totally under our control and need not be visible to the users. |
| 15:17 |
|
|
Jens81 joined #virtualJUG |
| 15:17 |
|
radcortez |
yeah :) |
| 15:20 |
|
sblanc |
https://twitter.com/rafabene should be able to answer some of the deltaspike questions ;) |
| 15:21 |
|
radcortez |
cool :D |
| 15:25 |
|
sblanc |
and swarm , using Forge of course ;) |
| 15:26 |
|
radcortez |
any more questions guys? |
| 15:26 |
|
radcortez |
we will wrap |
| 15:28 |
|
ejan |
Antonio's opinion on domain objects -- do you prefer objects with simple getters/setters and validation as a separate step (this would also include using Validation API) or do you prefer objects that are always in a consistent state (this arguably creates some issues with frameworks like when you want to bind objects to JSON, frameworks will require getters/setters, no-arg constructor etc.). So consistency vs. convenience I think |
| 15:28 |
|
ejan |
but what's your preference/opinion and why? |
| 15:30 |
|
ejan |
What's the best option for doing Web UI in Java EE world today? Would you say JSF, or wait for Java EE MVC :) , or use Angular et. al? |
| 15:30 |
|
radcortez |
Angular I guess, Antonio just asnwered :D |
| 15:30 |
|
ejan |
Yep, crissed crossed :) |
| 15:31 |
|
ejan |
LOL |
| 15:31 |
|
ejan |
that broke the Internt |
| 15:31 |
|
radcortez |
:D |
| 15:31 |
|
radcortez |
lol |
| 15:34 |
|
ejan |
That's our guy -- the best architects always answer this way 'well, it depends...' :) |
| 15:36 |
|
ejan |
In addition Batch API is mostly XML, yikes! Plus it looks mostly like a copy of Spring Batch. Double Yikes!! |
| 15:37 |
|
gsson |
A problem isn't interesting unless that's the answer :) |
| 15:37 |
|
ejan |
:) |
| 15:41 |
|
radcortez |
:D |
| 15:44 |
|
sblanc |
we can start a new hashtag #lessboatsmorebrains ;) |
| 15:44 |
|
ejan |
Thanks so much guys for arranging this! |
| 15:46 |
|
radcortez |
ty! |
| 16:44 |
|
|
_ollie joined #virtualJUG |
| 18:28 |
|
|
branscha joined #virtualJUG |
| 20:04 |
|
|
branscha joined #virtualJUG |
| 20:35 |
|
|
branscha joined #virtualJUG |
| 21:03 |
|
|
branscha joined #virtualJUG |
| 21:16 |
|
|
branscha joined #virtualJUG |
| 22:16 |
|
|
branscha joined #virtualJUG |
