| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:31 |
|
|
tbsf joined #rest |
| 02:24 |
|
|
tbsf joined #rest |
| 02:29 |
|
|
fuzzyhorns joined #rest |
| 03:40 |
|
|
tbsf joined #rest |
| 04:31 |
|
|
tbsf joined #rest |
| 05:01 |
|
|
upasana joined #rest |
| 07:25 |
|
|
ShekharReddy joined #rest |
| 07:33 |
|
|
Davey joined #rest |
| 07:33 |
|
|
Davey joined #rest |
| 10:26 |
|
|
wsieroci joined #rest |
| 10:29 |
|
|
wsieroci joined #rest |
| 12:37 |
|
|
_ollie joined #rest |
| 13:46 |
|
|
graste joined #rest |
| 14:15 |
|
|
tbsf joined #rest |
| 14:33 |
|
|
tbsf joined #rest |
| 14:51 |
|
|
wsieroci_ joined #rest |
| 15:09 |
|
|
ShekharReddy joined #rest |
| 15:27 |
|
|
tbsf joined #rest |
| 15:34 |
|
|
graste joined #rest |
| 15:56 |
|
|
tbsf joined #rest |
| 16:15 |
|
|
Tomatosoup1 joined #rest |
| 16:15 |
|
Tomatosoup1 |
Roy Fielding's dissertation was written in context of HTTP 1.1 - what about HTTP/2 ? are there any changes in architectural style ? |
| 16:19 |
|
|
ShekharReddy joined #rest |
| 16:29 |
|
|
_ollie joined #rest |
| 18:16 |
|
|
Tomatosoup joined #rest |
| 18:40 |
|
|
fuzzyhorns joined #rest |
| 18:56 |
|
|
Devastator joined #rest |
| 20:25 |
|
|
wsieroci_ joined #rest |
| 21:41 |
|
|
fuzzyhorns joined #rest |
| 22:13 |
|
mamund |
Tomatosoup: you still there? i don't see anything changing in his style (15 yrs old now). |
| 22:15 |
|
Tomatosoup |
mamund: yep, im still here |
| 22:15 |
|
mamund |
esp. since his style spans other protocols like CoAP. |
| 22:15 |
|
mamund |
Fielding also has talked about another protocol design called WAKA that he sez matches his style better. |
| 22:15 |
|
mamund |
someday we might see that<g> |
| 22:16 |
|
mamund |
HTTP2 is really, IMO, an optimization. binary is the default, compression on the headers, SSL is preferred. |
| 22:17 |
|
mamund |
no new methods, not changes to the way conneg works, authneg, encoding, etc. |
| 22:17 |
|
mamund |
that's my POV anyway. |
| 22:18 |
|
Tomatosoup |
that is basically what i thought, the underlying architecture of protocol is pretty much the same, lots of optimization, as you said |
| 22:19 |
|
mamund |
after close to 25 years of HTTP, i think there is not much likelihood of any breakout changes to the protocol. |
| 22:19 |
|
mamund |
instead, we'll "fork it" and create new ones (like CoAP, really). |
| 22:21 |
|
Tomatosoup |
CoAP - it is subsitute for HTTP ? |
| 22:24 |
|
mamund |
not a substitute, but i think of it as a follow-on or sequel<g> |
| 22:25 |
|
mamund |
uses UDP, binary msgs, and the msgs are quite short (4k max, i think). designed for low power, small deivce, IOT-stype stuff. |
| 22:25 |
|
mamund |
anyway, has almost all the hallmarks of FIelding' |
| 22:25 |
|
mamund |
Fielding's REST style but over UDP. |
| 22:26 |
|
mamund |
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252 |
| 22:30 |
|
Tomatosoup |
that is interesting |
| 22:31 |
|
Tomatosoup |
what about usage, since it is UDP ? Restful conferences ? |
| 22:32 |
|
mamund |
?? |
| 22:32 |
|
Tomatosoup |
that was just silly statement :P but i just wonder when it is usefull since it is via UDP |
| 22:32 |
|
mamund |
ahhh |
| 22:33 |
|
mamund |
well, broadcasting to lots of low-power devices is a great use-case for UDP. |
| 22:33 |
|
Tomatosoup |
well, im aware of UDP protocol, but im talking about any changes beacuse od CoAP |
| 22:33 |
|
Tomatosoup |
it is worth changing ? |
| 22:34 |
|
mamund |
well, CoAP is not a replacement for HTTP, it's a fork for a diff set of use-cases. |
| 22:35 |
|
mamund |
if you find yourself doing lots of IoT, i think CoAP can make sense. |
| 22:35 |
|
Tomatosoup |
you know what, i guess my questions are just silly |
| 22:35 |
|
Tomatosoup |
i will spend some time reading about CoAP |
| 22:36 |
|
Tomatosoup |
and then maybe ask for something :) |
| 22:36 |
|
mamund |
LOL! |
| 22:36 |
|
mamund |
often doing beats asking, eh? |
| 22:36 |
|
mamund |
http://www.herjulf.se/download/coap-2013-fall.pdf |
| 22:36 |
|
mamund |
not sure how accurate this is anymore (from 2013) but one of my "go to" decks when ppl ask |
| 22:37 |
|
Tomatosoup |
what you mean by "beats asking" ?:P |
| 22:40 |
|
Tomatosoup |
mamund: i still dont quite get what does 'betas asking' mean :P |
| 22:40 |
|
Tomatosoup |
*beats |
| 22:41 |
|
Tomatosoup |
nvm, just didnt know this phrasal verb (or idiom, whatever) |
| 22:45 |
|
Tomatosoup |
thanks anyway |
| 22:46 |
|
Tomatosoup |
btw mamund, would you recommand me must-read position about REST ? |
| 23:46 |
|
|
fuzzyhorns joined #rest |