Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
00:08 |
|
|
licyeus joined #rest |
00:50 |
|
|
null_ref joined #rest |
01:51 |
|
|
rincewind3 joined #rest |
02:04 |
|
|
HighBit joined #rest |
02:32 |
|
|
pdurbin joined #rest |
07:40 |
|
|
ph88 joined #rest |
08:08 |
|
|
graste joined #rest |
08:15 |
|
|
wilmoore joined #rest |
08:24 |
|
|
danielemm joined #rest |
08:58 |
|
|
martinfilliau joined #rest |
10:16 |
|
|
solars joined #rest |
10:17 |
|
solars |
hi there, two years ago I had a tool that generated a working client description in html (params description etc) from a REST service description in json. I cannot find it anymore.. is there something similar meanwhile that can be used in the same way? |
10:18 |
|
solars |
i.e. that let's me define the service and uses it to generate forms and documentation for the params |
10:22 |
|
rincewind3 |
solars: swagger might be an alternative? https://helloreverb.com/developers/swagger |
10:24 |
|
solars |
hm it seems swagger uses a json description, isn't there a standard json schema/hyperschema or so for this? |
10:25 |
|
solars |
ah it uses it |
10:26 |
|
solars |
thanks a lot |
10:30 |
|
|
Left_Turn joined #rest |
10:37 |
|
|
shrink0r joined #rest |
12:19 |
|
|
interop_madness joined #rest |
13:29 |
|
|
charlie joined #rest |
13:30 |
|
|
Guest28263 joined #rest |
13:49 |
|
|
saml joined #rest |
14:02 |
|
|
null_ref joined #rest |
14:35 |
|
|
danizord joined #rest |
14:38 |
|
|
ferz joined #rest |
14:38 |
|
ferz |
Hi |
14:39 |
|
ferz |
I've a tree, I need to know if when I add a new leaf I need to declare full path to its parent or if I can use the parentid only. |
14:44 |
|
|
pezra joined #rest |
15:23 |
|
blongden |
ferz: Is the leaf a part of the parent? |
15:24 |
|
blongden |
Or is it a standalone resource? |
15:47 |
|
|
fumanchu joined #rest |
15:51 |
|
|
fumanchu joined #rest |
16:09 |
|
|
fumanchu joined #rest |
16:15 |
|
|
danielemm2 joined #rest |
16:17 |
|
|
charlie_ joined #rest |
16:20 |
|
|
charlex joined #rest |
16:32 |
|
|
qw3rtman joined #rest |
16:33 |
|
qw3rtman |
Hey guys, quick question. Would a request like POST /resource/create be a valid representation of creating that resource? |
16:34 |
|
whartung |
sure |
16:34 |
|
whartung |
that is |
16:35 |
|
whartung |
if you send a valid representation via a request like that, it's fair to have that create an actual resource on the reciever. |
16:38 |
|
|
fumanchu joined #rest |
16:43 |
|
qw3rtman |
whartung: Sweet, thanks for clarifying! |
17:01 |
|
|
wilmoore joined #rest |
17:52 |
|
|
qw3rtman joined #rest |
18:06 |
|
|
Gobitron joined #rest |
18:38 |
|
spaceone |
what would be an example of implicit as cacheable labelled data? |
18:39 |
|
|
fumanchu joined #rest |
18:39 |
|
whartung |
I don't know what that means spaceone |
18:40 |
|
spaceone |
whartung: "Cache constraints require that the data within a response to a request be implicitly or explicitly labeled as cacheable or non-cacheable." |
18:41 |
|
whartung |
where do you see that? I can't think of something as "implcitly cacheable" |
18:42 |
|
spaceone |
in the Software Architecture Dissertation |
18:42 |
|
spaceone |
https://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style.htm |
18:42 |
|
spaceone |
5.1.4 Cache |
18:44 |
|
whartung |
to me |
18:44 |
|
whartung |
implicit caching |
18:44 |
|
spaceone |
would "implicitely cacheable" that if e.g. some standanrd like HTTP defines that a representation is cacheable if no further headers say the opossite? |
18:44 |
|
whartung |
would be documented externally |
18:44 |
|
whartung |
yea, something "somewhere else" (i.e. not the request) says this is cacheable, so I can cache it. |
18:45 |
|
spaceone |
yep, ok |
18:51 |
|
spaceone |
in the case of HTTP - what does RFC 723X say about if no headers regarding caching are present in a response? |
18:52 |
|
spaceone |
i am wondering if just IE is broken or if everyone tell IE is broken but they don't use HTTP caching correct |
18:52 |
|
whartung |
I've never heard of RFC 723X |
18:52 |
|
whartung |
afaik, caching is never correct accross browsers and proxies and caches lol |
18:53 |
|
spaceone |
RFC 7230 - 7240 have been released this month - it's the redefintion of HTTP/1.1 |
18:53 |
|
whartung |
ah ok |
18:53 |
|
whartung |
yea I heard some mumbling about that |
18:53 |
|
spaceone |
cleaned up RFC2616 |
18:53 |
|
whartung |
I have not read them |
18:53 |
|
spaceone |
i read and worked a little on the drafts - but never really the caching part |
18:54 |
|
whartung |
cool! Thanks for the work! |
18:54 |
|
spaceone |
;) i do everything for a great WWW |
18:54 |
|
whartung |
:) |
18:55 |
|
spaceone |
but better give thanks to Roy Fielding and Julian Reschke |
18:55 |
|
spaceone |
they were the ones which did the work |
18:56 |
|
whartung |
yea, but they're not here :) |
18:56 |
|
whartung |
you are |
18:56 |
|
whartung |
so, thanks! |
18:56 |
|
spaceone |
^^ |
19:00 |
|
|
ferz joined #rest |
19:05 |
|
spaceone |
i am currently searching for a picture i once found. The picture was created by Tim Berners-Lee and shows how Ressources are connected and related to each other. If anyone know this or such a picture, please tell me |
19:07 |
|
|
shrink0r joined #rest |
19:07 |
|
pdurbin |
line art? jpg? |
19:08 |
|
spaceone |
i guess JPG/PNG,... but of course line art with some description |
19:09 |
|
spaceone |
i don't remember exactly, i only know that i was pretty fascinated about it |
19:09 |
|
spaceone |
it provided a good view on the WWW architecture and connected hyperlinks and so on |
19:19 |
|
spaceone |
"unified interface between components" - does this mean that the data and the data transfer are in a standardized format? |
19:20 |
|
spaceone |
like HTTP for transferring and HTML/XHTML/XML as part of the representation |
19:34 |
|
|
charlie_ joined #rest |
19:53 |
|
|
qw3rtman joined #rest |
19:58 |
|
|
fumanchu joined #rest |
20:37 |
|
ferz |
blongden: a leaf is a standalone resource that can change parent if the user think it's right. |
20:40 |
|
|
Left_Turn joined #rest |
21:05 |
|
|
graste joined #rest |
21:21 |
|
|
ferz joined #rest |
21:56 |
|
|
qw3rtman joined #rest |
21:58 |
|
|
Left_Turn joined #rest |
22:27 |
|
|
fumanchu joined #rest |
22:30 |
|
|
pezra joined #rest |
22:59 |
|
|
qw3rtman joined #rest |
23:12 |
|
|
wilmoore joined #rest |