| Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
| 11:36 |
|
prologic |
lol |
| 11:36 |
|
prologic |
no I don't think we should necessarily per se |
| 11:36 |
|
prologic |
I'm just say'n :) |
| 12:21 |
|
pdurbin |
fine |
| 12:22 |
|
pdurbin |
prologic: now there's graphviz code to remix that "never finish" meme: https://twitter.com/philipdurbin/status/1234473349801283585 |
| 12:22 |
|
prologic |
hahaha |
| 15:10 |
|
dotplus |
I'm not opposed to renaming. Although I'm not sure that it's necessary; do we really need to ensure that the name is globally unique? otoh, it's been years since we've made any progress on this idea and the world of messaging has changed a lot since then. On the 3rd hand, I would not like to lose this and communication with you (although of course we could maintain that elsewhere, notably #crimsonfu/sour |
| 15:10 |
|
dotplus |
cefu |
| 18:27 |
|
pdurbin |
dotplus: I guess that's the 4th hand (this is getting weird)... consolidating into a single community. What binds us? |
| 18:51 |
|
dotplus |
ah, now there's a hard question. a history of shared interactions in the areas that many of us consider interesting/fun/important, (not comprehensively) including: communication in/with/for tech: software, protocols, process, style), (computing) systems & services/servers/infra, various different aspects/implementations of the ideas of [Open, community, ...] |
| 18:51 |
|
pdurbin |
actually, I already collected the data |
| 18:51 |
|
* pdurbin |
searches |
