Time |
S |
Nick |
Message |
01:22 |
|
pdurbin |
The other day I was talking about Java 9 in here and I wrote up some more thoughts on how I don't think we should force our users to upgrade to a non-LTS release like Java 9: https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues/4259 |
01:31 |
|
aditsu |
pdurbin: but what are the reasons *for* switching to java 9? |
01:32 |
|
aditsu |
so far I only know it has improved http/2 support |
01:32 |
|
pdurbin |
aditsu: well, "end of public updates" for Java 8 is Sep 2018. That means security patches. This is from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html |
01:35 |
|
aditsu |
that means you don't need to worry about it until then :) |
01:35 |
|
aditsu |
also, users can upgrade to java 9 and still run a project made for java 8 |
01:36 |
|
pdurbin |
I'm more talking about forcing users to run Java 9. Making our app only run on Java 9. |
01:36 |
|
aditsu |
yes, and I'm asking why you would even consider doing that |
01:38 |
|
pdurbin |
Well, that's what we did when we moved from Java 7 to Java 8. We changed our Maven "target" to 1.8. |
01:55 |
|
pdurbin |
It was the right thing to do because Java 7 wasn't going to keep getting security patches. |
01:58 |
|
aditsu |
so far, still no reason; "what we did when we moved from Java 7 to Java 8" is completely irrelevant, and availability of java security patches is a reason for users to upgrade, but not a reason for you to switch and force users to upgrade |
01:58 |
|
aditsu |
and even if it was a reason, it wouldn't apply until late 2018 |
02:01 |
|
aditsu |
switching to java 8 can be justified by the benefits you get from the new language features |
02:04 |
|
pdurbin |
I guess you're saying we could keep our app compatible with Java 6 or some other older release that doeson't get security patches and let our users decide when to upgrade to a version of Java that gets security patches. |
02:04 |
|
aditsu |
sure, unless you have actual reasons to switch to a newer version (as I just gave an example) |
02:08 |
|
pdurbin |
Well, Java 8 had a lot of shiny new features. :) |
02:08 |
|
aditsu |
yes, and I agree, but I was asking about java 9 |
02:12 |
|
pdurbin |
I'm not especially interested in any of the features in Java 9. |
02:16 |
|
aditsu |
yeah, so then there's no need to upgrade |
02:29 |
|
pdurbin |
yeah |
05:15 |
|
mr_lou |
Since Java 9 prevents me from compiling Blu-ray Xlets, I'm hoping to be able to keep on using Java 8 forever. |
05:15 |
|
mr_lou |
I mean JDK 8 |
08:43 |
|
|
kirua joined ##friendlyjava |
11:17 |
|
|
xBADDA555 joined ##friendlyjava |
11:57 |
|
|
mr_lou joined ##friendlyjava |
15:30 |
|
|
kirua joined ##friendlyjava |
21:02 |
|
|
ChanServ joined ##friendlyjava |
21:41 |
|
|
xBADDA555 joined ##friendlyjava |
22:12 |
|
|
kirua joined ##friendlyjava |